The Queen
    
reviewed by Rad
Bennett

Photo © Miramax Films
|
It is exceptionally difficult to make realistic movies
about living or recently deceased people. They usually come off as romanticized visions,
as Ray Charles in Ray, or Johnny Cash in Walk the Line. The actual people
and historical events are just too close for us not to remember. However, in the case of
the royal family of Britain -- and especially in the case of Queen Elizabeth II, who has
been monarch since 1954 -- all we know are the formal public appearances; everything else
is guarded and private. Seeing Stephen Frears The Queen, then, is a striking
experience that makes us feel as if we are getting an intimate, privileged look behind the
scenes.
Except for a preamble that introduces the main characters,
the story is confined to one week in August 1997: the seven days following the death of
Princess Diana. In the preamble, set just months before, Tony Blair has become Prime
Minister and, in his first audience with the Queen, she has reminded him that her first PM
was Winston Churchill. It is clear that while they have yet to establish a working
relationship, Dianas death forces them to understand and work with each other. The
Queen and her family want to do nothing to commemorate Dianas death, and in a sense
she is correct. Diana had already divorced Prince Charles and left the royal family behind
her, burning her bridges, as it were.
Blair sees things differently. He realizes that, for
whatever reason, Diana is thought of as "the Peoples princess." The public
is puzzled by the actions of Elizabeth II and the royal family -- or, rather, by their
inaction. The Queen refuses to fly the flag at half-staff, or to make a royal statement
about the tragedy. Blair works to change her point of view, forcing her to realize that
her aloof manner could cause the monarchy to crumble.
This might sound like dry material, but The Queen is
anything but. It is told in brief segments that, under their stiff propriety, are filled
with nuance and humor. This works mostly because of the fine acting and directing. Helen
Mirren is Elizabeth II, and her performance is faultless, making us feel that the Queen is
actually revealing her inner thoughts. It is just as remarkable a performance as the one
Mirren gave on HBO a year ago, as Elizabeth I. (In an unprecedented event, the Screen
Actors Guild recently honored her with awards for both performances.) Whether driving the
royal 4WD over the moors, parading past all the flowers and gifts left in memory of Diana,
or finally making a speech to the nation about Dianas death, Mirren is right in
character, giving us glimpses of the woman behind the public figure.
Michael Sheen brings exuberance and insight to his role as
the boyish Tony Blair. His Blair has charm to spare, but behind this we sense resolve. The
scenes with Sheen and Mirren crackle with the unspoken, conveyed through body language and
facial expression. James Cromwell is appropriately self-effacing as Prince Philip, the
husband of a woman known and loved by the public much better than he is. Sylvia Sims is
bouncy, brittle, and bucolic as the Queen Mother, and all of the Princes are played
exceptionally well.
Diana is shown as herself in many video clips and
voice-overs. That was a brilliant stroke, for she is the most identifiable character of
all. Had she been played by an actress, I dont think we would have been able to
believe in the events as much as we do.
The sets are meticulous, and the photography makes good use
of color. Alexandre Desplats music score is appropriate at all times, and the
costumes look as real as clothes the royal family might actually wear. The pacing seems
perfect and the 97-minute length right. The movie says what it has to say, then exits
without unnecessary padding.
Having already won the Golden Globe and SAG awards, Mirren
has been nominated for an Academy Award for Best Actress for this role. My bet is that
shell get it, and my feeling is that it is well deserved. |