3:10 to Yuma
    
reviewed by Rad
Bennett

Photo © Lionsgate
|
Im not generally in favor of remakes in which an
earlier film is reconstructed, almost word for word, by another cast and director. But
when both films are based on the same novel or story, I can just consider the second film
a different version of the original story.
3:10 to Yuma, based on a 1953 short story by
novelist and screenwriter Elmore Leonard, was first filmed in 1957, with director Delmer
Daves, Glenn Ford as the dangerous outlaw Ben Wade, and Van Heflin as cattle farmer Dan
Evans. One of the best Westerns of the 1950s, the black-and-white film was a great success
in an era when the genre was almost guaranteed to bring in good box-office profits. In the
years since, the Western has died as a viable form of Hollywood entertainment. There have
been attempts to resurrect it, with such films as Silverado (1985), Dances with
Wolves (1990), and the revisionist Unforgiven (1992), but though these movies
individually won praise, they have not ignited a Western revival.
The 2007 edition of 3:10 to Yuma provides another
opportunity, and proves that action films need not be relegated to spy or martial arts
stories. And it hits with a heavy cast. Handsome, irascible Russell Crowe plays the outlaw
Wade, and the new Batman, Christian Bale, is rancher Evans. Its in color and
widescreen, and packs into its 117 minutes (the 1957 version was only 92 minutes) more
plot elements, deeper characterization, and generally enlarges the story.
On the surface, the plot is simplicity itself: a knockoff
of High Noon in which rancher Evans agrees to escort Wade to the train station to
put him on the 3:10 prison train to Yuma, Arizona. As the hours go by, everyone deserts
Evans, the bad guys are coming to town in force to spring Wade, and we know there will be
a final shoot-out. But this new version delves deeper into the relationship between the
bad guy and the good guy. What made each the way he is? What secrets does each carry? Why
does one regard the other as a hero? The carefully written dialogue for Wade and Evans
answers many of these questions while leaving some to speculation.
But just because the filmmakers try to get inside the
characters, dont feel that the killing is neglected. These bad guys are really
bad. They shoot without question or thought. Theres no "Im gonna kill you
cause you shot my pa, whaddaya think of that?" Theres no time for an
answer because the question is never asked. The killing is sudden and brutal, and the line
is clearly drawn between good and bad.
As Wade, Russell Crowe is smooth and deceptive. Though
hes charming on the surface, we know that, inside, hes a cold-blooded killer.
As played by Christian Bale, Evans, too, is complicated. This time around Evans has a bum
leg, and lives a lie: hes told people he got the wound while fighting in the Civil
War. The rest of the cast is ideal. Special mention needs to be given Ben Foster as
Wades right-hand man, Charlie Prince, about the baddest psychotic gunman youll
see in any genre. Fosters zeal seems so genuine that hes genuinely frightening
to watch -- whenever hes onscreen, I cant take my eyes off him, wondering what
bad thing hell be up to next. The role clearly makes him a candidate for the
years Best Supporting Actor Oscar. Foster played Russell Corwin, Claire
Fishers sensitive sometime boyfriend, in the hit HBO series Six Feet Under;
in hindsight, his final appearance in that series, in an art gallery scene, now seems to
look forward to the role of Charlie Prince.
Director James Mangold does a generally good job, but the
pacing is off every now and then, which robs the film of some suspense. And the dialogue
is sometimes hard to understand, which also occasionally slows things down. But overall, 3:10
to Yuma is grand entertainment, a traditional Western set in a gritty Old West where
the only law was the gun -- especially when that gun was in the hand of Charlie Prince or
Ben Wade. |