Inside Man
    
reviewed by Rad
Bennett

Photo © Universal Pictures
|
Director Spike Lee has always termed each of his films A
Spike Lee Joint. The term is apt -- Lees movies have always been, even when
flawed, audacious and in ones face. When they succeed, as did Do the Right Thing,
they have been powerful and thought-provoking. Lee does that occasionally in Inside
Man -- one line says what it took Crash more than two hours to say -- but for
most of the film, this maverick director takes a safe detour into the land of genre.
Inside Man is a heist film, a tribute to such films
as Dog Day Afternoon, which is even quoted. It also owes a lot to the French heist
movies of Jules Dassin (Topkapi) and his imitators. Much of the story is told in
flashback as the police interrogate the banks occupants after their release: Four
masked thieves, dressed as painters, invade a bank at peak hour, taking employees and
customers as hostages. The hostages are forced to strip, then dress in garb exactly like
the clothes the thieves are wearing. The viewer thinks hes got it all figured out:
The bad guys rob the bank, then escape as customers.
No way. The script has more twists than a pretzel served
with a side of red herrings. About 30 minutes into the movie it becomes evident that, as
tough as gang leader Dalton Russell (Clive Owen) is, he doesnt intend to kill
anyone. This puzzles Keith Frazier (Denzel Washington), the detective in charge of the
case, who sets out to discover the reason. Why are these bank robbers not making away with
the money? Why are they taking so long to negotiate?
The cast is impeccable. Washington plays Frazier as a
likable guy whod rather be home with his knockout of a girlfriend than out on the
streets risking his life. But as long as hes on the scene, he wants to do his job
well. Part bluff cop, part Columbo-style detective, hes always looking for that last
detail that will make all the pieces fit -- a regular-Joe gumshoe with a steel-trap brain.
Clive Owen, as the lead robber, is cool and suave in a way
that seems entirely appropriate to his plan. Jodie Foster is Madeline White, who seems to
have power over everyone in New York City. We are never told why White is so cruel and
calculated, but we are never in doubt that she has the power she wields. She has
apparently been hired by Arthur Case, the Jewish philanthropist who owns the bank.
Christopher Plummer plays Case well but cant convince us that he is as old as the
script says he must be.
But make that leap, and a few others, and youll be
royally entertained. Its a joy to watch such pros as Washington and Foster in their
scenes together. Its also a joy to watch the intricate cinematography of Matthew
Libatique. This is a movie movie -- the camera constantly pans and tracks and
zooms. These technical events are never gratuitous, but we are never allowed to forget
that we are watching a film. One scene serves as a good example: Russell is in the bank
vault talking to a young boy when he becomes alarmed at the violence portrayed on the
boys handheld video game. The camera starts back from the two, then zooms into the
vault, and at the end of the scene pulls back to make a perfect cinematic frame for this
very Spike Lee-like scene. There are many Lee regulars on hand, including composer Terence
Blanchard, whose lush, jazz-tinged score often plays against the action onscreen as a
purposeful irritant.
If you can, see Inside Man in a theater with
better-than-average projection equipment and superlative sound. The end credits list a
small army of people who worked on the sound, and the results are outstanding. Inside
Man has one of the best surround-sound designs I have ever heard. It is vital, at many
points, to explaining and propelling the onscreen action.
The above may sound as if Im describing a four-star
movie. I would be were it not for the fact that Inside Man too often meanders.
Sometimes we are left with too long a breath while waiting for the next bit to go down. I
knock off half a star for that wayward pacing, but its still well worth waiting for
the next bit of character development or surprise. In taking on a familiar genre and doing
it on his own terms, Spike Lee is still audacious. And still well worth watching. |