| Video Noise December 2003
LCoS and D-ILA Video
Displays: Pros and Cons
Last month
I discussed LCD, and before that, DLP. This month we come to
a video display technology that perhaps deserves your attention more than either of the
others. Why LCoS/D-ILA is not the dominant fixed-pixel display technology is one of the
mysteries of the technology market. LCoS/D-ILA devices have clear advantages over other
fixed-pixel technologies -- and one drawback. Unfortunately for consumers, LCoS/D-ILA
offers the fewest commercial products to choose from, though the ones that exist are
impressive.
LCoS stands for Liquid Crystal on Silicon, D-ILA
for JVCs Digital direct drive Image Light Amplifier. There are two names because JVC
wants you to think that D-ILA is a unique version of the LCoS technology. But Im not
crazy about JVCs label, because D-ILA devices do not amplify light in any way
-- in fact, you lose some light with the D-ILA process, as you do with any LCoS
device. For the purposes of this article, LCoS will stand for D-ILA as well.
Technology
LCD technology relies on a transparent LCD panel: The light
source is behind the panel, the projection screen in front, and light passes directly
through the panel to get to the display screen. LCoS is different -- the liquid crystal is
on top of an opaque silicon chip containing an array of electronic pixel-drive devices.
There is a layer of highly reflective material on top of all the control circuits and
devices. The liquid-crystal sandwich (liquid crystal between two layers of very thin
transparent material with a protective glass or quartz outer surface) mounts on top of the
mirrored surface. Light cannot pass through an LCoS chip as it does through a conventional
LCD panel. Normally, that would be a serious problem, because the light source and
projection screen would have to be in line with each other -- the light source would block
the light trying to get to the projection screen.
| LCoS/D-ILA Pros and Cons at a Glance Pros
- Darkest black levels of any fixed-pixel device -- only a CRT
can equal or exceed the blacks and shadows of an LCoS display.
- Only fixed-pixel technology able to deliver full 1920x1080
progressive-scan resolution in consumer products.
- Tightest-packed pixels of any fixed-pixel technology, with the
least visible pixel structure (except for projection CRTs, which dont have pixels).
- Perfect geometry.
- No problems with burning stationary images or logos into the
display device, as with CRT and plasma displays.
- Good brightness and detail in light areas of the image in dark
or near-dark home theaters.
Cons
- Fixed-pixel technologies require high-performance scaling and
interlaced/progressive conversion and scaling.
- Lamp life can be as short as 1000-2000 hours, or 8 to 16
months if used four hours per day.
- Lamps are at least as expensive as LCD or DLP lamps.
- Contrast ratio may be a little lower than is optimal, but is
competitive with most other fixed-pixel displays.
- Few models to choose from as of December 2003.
...Doug Blackburn
db@hometheatersound.com |
|
|
For example, lets assume that the LCoS light source
is pointed at the ceiling. But you need the image to be on the screen of a rear-projection
TV or on the wall. A special 45-degree angled mirror is placed above the light source to
reflect light toward the LCoS chip. The light travels through the liquid-crystal layer,
reflects off the mirrored surface, and bounces back through the liquid-crystal layer again
on its way to the screen. But that pesky 45-degree mirror is in the way. How does the
light get through? Thats the trick: the mirror has a specially polarized surface.
Light from the LCoS device is polarized at the same 45-degree angle: the light from the
LCoS chip can pass right through the 45-degree mirror as if it was not there.
However, the polarized mirror loses some light. There is
also some small loss from the light passing twice through the liquid crystal layer, though
this is offset by the fact that the two passes help produce better blacks. Some light is
attenuated from blacks when the light makes its first pass through the liquid-crystal
layer (only when pixels are darkened for black/dark areas of the image, of course). But
that same light reflects off the mirrored surface under the liquid-crystal layer, then
passes through it a second time, further attenuating the light where there are darker
pixels. In essence, LCoS blacks are twice as dark, or half as contaminated with light, as
blacks from LCD, DLP, or plasma displays.
Furthermore, because the transistors and supporting
components that turn LCoS pixels on and off are below the liquid-crystal layer, they
dont interfere with light passing through the panel, nor do they affect pixel
spacing, as in LCD displays. This means that LCoS pixels can be spaced closer together
than LCD pixels. As you approach an LCoS image, or increase its projected sized, it will
look better than an LCD image because the pixels in the display panel itself are closer
together.
Lamp considerations
Because of the slight losses in the light path already
discussed, illumination is the major issue with LCoS displays. Typically, their lamps cost
as much as LCD lamps ($100-$400 USD).
Black performance
LCoS and D-ILA display devices have produced the best video
images I have ever seen from a fixed-pixel display -- only CRT projectors can equal or
beat the black levels of a well-designed LCoS product. This will be quite noticeable in
night and other darkly lit scenes. Shadows will be far more detailed, and action will be
much more easy to follow on a good CRT or LCoS display than on any other currently
available technology. Highlight detail in LCoS products is also impressive, perhaps owing
to the two passes the light has to make through the LCoS chip.
Contrast ratio
For the same reason lamps are an issue for LCoS displays,
contrast ratio is a little more of a challenge. Contrast ratios tend to be in the 600:1
range -- about middling for a display technology. But there are exceptions; one
manufacturer of LCoS displays, who makes sets to be sold only under other brand names,
claims a 2500:1 contrast ratio, though with no documentation that supports how this is
achieved. While a higher contrast ratio is usually better, beautiful images with
absolutely no compromise in white/bright levels are easily possible in dark or near-dark
home theaters with LCoS consumer products. But the relatively low maximum brightness
levels of LCoS displays make them unsuitable for viewing in brightly lit rooms.
Resolution
LCoS consumer displays are the only consumer fixed-pixel
displays that can display the highest HDTV resolution, 1920x1080, with no loss of
resolution. The largest LCoS panels actually have 2048x1536 pixels. This applies to
monochrome LCoS panels. To display color HDTV images you would need three such panels: one
each for red, green, and blue light. Single-panel LCoS chips have RGB pixels in groups of
three pixels on a single chip. White light is needed to illuminate the color image these
LCoS chips produce. However, the resolution of single-panel LCoS chips is limited to
1280x720 -- still fairly impressive for a three-color chip.
Single-chip LCoS displays are now being developed for the
consumer market. Three-chip consumer projectors for front-projection and self-contained
rear-projection sets are now available in 1920x1080 and 1280x720 progressive resolutions.
Scaling
Like all fixed-pixel devices, an LCoS display needs to
scale the various resolutions of video sources to match its own "native"
resolution and thus fill the screen. Without scaling, lower-resolution sources would be
displayed as smaller images. With scaling, pixels are added to lower-resolution images to
fill up the LCoS panel, so that the image remains as large as possible on the video
display screen. Of course, this tends to make the scaled-up video sources look a bit soft
-- once an image has left the source device, detail cant be "added" to it.
Also, conversion of interlaced sources to progressive-scan images is tricky at best, and
requires a lot of processing power.
Other issues
Some have criticized the LCoS technology for using organic
compounds that can degrade, and lead to failure of LCoS devices. JVC has written
engineering white papers detailing the construction of their D-ILA/LCoS chips, and showing
that no organics whatsoever are used in the manufacture of the chips.
JVC has also published documents, available to casual Web
searchers, that detail tests from which they extrapolate that the working lives of various
materials used in the chips are "over 50 years" or "over 150 years,"
etc. These materials are then subjected to further abuse that results in findings that
components of the chip will last "more than eight years" or "more than 10
years" -- no worse than the materials used in other solid-state display technologies.
I have not seen such documentation from other LCoS manufacturers, but that doesnt
mean it doesnt exist.
...Doug Blackburn
db@hometheatersound.com |