HOME THEATER & SOUND -- Editorial

Editorial

August 2005

Performance Isn't Everything

"Performance isn’t everything? Blasphemy!" I hear you saying. I recently had a conversation with a serious home-theater enthusiast. He was complaining about the lack of truly worthy performance from some of the home-theater components his friends and family owned or were planning to buy. Basically, he thought what they were considering stank. His position was that the on-wall and in-wall speaker systems and flat-screen televisions so popular today are designed more for convenience and décor than for ultimate performance. How could folks buy these products when the same money could be spent on a large CRT television and freestanding loudspeakers, which would perform better and therefore provide more enjoyment?

I couldn’t argue the point with regard to ultimate performance. There’s no question that when you don’t care about inconvenience, better performance can be had for the same cost. I can, however, argue the point about enjoyment.

The mistake this gentleman made was to assume that ultimate enjoyment is always in lockstep with ultimate performance. This might be true for the hardcore home-theater enthusiast, but for everyday folk it simply is not. When my parents recently purchased bicycles, they didn’t go for Italian racing bikes or expensive Treks, such as the ones Lance Armstrong rides in the Tour de France. No, they bought easy-to-ride, cruiser-style bikes that fit their intended use while being comfortable, affordable, and easy to maintain. I’m glad no one tried to "upsale" them to a fancy-schmancy model that would have cost a lot more while not meeting their real needs. For my mom and dad to use these bikes regularly, get some occasional exercise, and enjoy some time outdoors, the preferred option was something simple and convenient.

Most people buy electronics with similar basic principles in mind. Sure, anyone who spends their hard-earned money on a home-theater system wants good performance and an enjoyable experience, but they also want the system to look good in their room, be easy to operate, and fit their budget. And guess what -- there’s nothing wrong with that. So my advice to the fellow HT enthusiast I was discussing this with was that he not discourage his friends and family. A small percentage of these buyers will gravitate to better gear, and that will grow the enthusiast end of our hobby. You’ll always have people who, once involved in even a limited way with an experience like home theater, will get the bug and be hooked for life, and it’s these folks who will build the dedicated theater rooms and buy the expensive gear. But for every one of them there will be 20 or so who will be satisfied with basic surround sound, a DVD player, and a TV on the wall.

We at Home Theater & Sound can point out to the average consumer the systems that might fit his or her idea of a good-looking home theater at a good price that performs reasonably well. We can also go after the systems that set aside convenience and price in search of the ultimate sonic and visual performance. Both types of product reviews are equally valid because both serve real consumers with specific needs and wants. We take both sorts of product reviews seriously because we recognize that all segments of the market are important to the industry’s health. That’s exactly what a good audio/video publication should do, and that’s what you can continue to expect from us, month after month.

 ...Jeff Fritz
editor@hometheatersound.com

 


PART OF THE SOUNDSTAGE NETWORK -- www.soundstagenetwork.com