HOME THEATER & SOUND -- Feature Article

Collector's Corner

September 2002

The Searchers

  • Starring: John Wayne, Jeffrey Hunter, Vera Miles, Ward Bond, Natalie Wood, Ken Curtis, Harry Carey Jr., Dorothy Jordan, Hank Worden, Walter Coy, Henry Brandon
  • Directed by: John Ford
  • Theatrical release: 1956
  • DVD release: 1997
  • Video: Full screen and anamorphic widescreen (dual-sided DVD)
  • Sound: Dolby Digital Mono

A door opens and, over Martha Edwards’s (Dorothy Jordan) shoulder, we see the beautiful Texas landscape. A lonesome rider in the distance is coming toward her. Soon, her husband Aaron (Walter Coy), her three children, and the dog are on the porch, trying to see who’s coming. It’s Aaron’s brother, Ethan Edwards (John Wayne), home from the Civil War. While they are eating, Martin Pawley (Jeffrey Hunter) comes riding up bareback and runs in. Ethan had rescued an infant, Martin, from an Indian raid and taken him to live in his brother’s house. Ethan starts scowling, saying Martin acts like a half-breed. Ethan’s face shows his hatred toward all Indians.

The next morning, a Texas Ranger’s posse rides up looking for volunteers to hunt for a cattle thief. The leader, Reverend Captain Samuel Johnson Clayton (Ward Bond), swears in Martin and Aaron to go on the chase. Old Mose Harper (Hank Worden) says he thinks it’s the work of Indians. Ethan decides he’ll go and leave Aaron to protect the family.

When they catch up, the cattle theft turns out to be a decoy, so that the Indians can circle back on a murder raid. The Indians kill Aaron, Martha, and their son, and kidnap the two daughters, Debbie (Lana Wood) and Lucy (Pippa Scott). The posse takes off in pursuit, trying to save the two young girls. They chase Chief Scar’s Comanches till they catch up, but then the hunters become the hunted. After a fight, most of the posse head home. Just Ethan, Martin, and Brad Jorgensen (Harry Carey, Jr.) continue.

The tribe splits up and Ethan follows one trail while Martin and Brad follow the other. When they get back together, Ethan is upset. Martin notices that Ethan has lost his coat. When they question him, he refuses to talk. They head on again.

The scene changes to night. Brad comes running up the hill, excited.

Brad: I found 'em! I found Lucy. They're camped about a half-mile over. I was just swinging back, and I seen their smoke. Bellied up a ridge, and there they was, right below me.
Martin: Did you see Debbie?
Brad: No, no. But I saw Lucy, all right. She was wearin' that blue dress that she…
Ethan: What you saw wasn't Lucy.
Brad: Oh, but it was, I tell ya.
Ethan: What you saw was a buck wearin' Lucy's dress. I found Lucy back in the canyon. Wrapped her in my coat, buried her with my own hands. Thought it best to keep it from you.
Brad: Well, did they…? Was she…?
Ethan: (Yelling) What do you want me to do? Draw you a picture? Spell it out? Don't ever ask me! Long as you live, don't ever ask me more.

Brad, filled with grief, attacks the Indian camp by himself and is killed. For five years, Ethan and Martin keep up the search, going through their own Odyssey. Ethan is sure that Debbie has been defiled by a "buck," somehow reducing her to less than human. His hatred of Indians runs deep enough that he can’t decide whether to kill or rescue Debbie. What will he do? For the sake of those that haven’t seen The Searchers, I’ll stop here.

The Searchers has always been one of Ford’s most misunderstood films. It wasn’t nominated for any awards. The critics didn’t understand it. Ford didn’t much care. The Searchers was his 115th film. He had already won four Oscars (The Informer -- 1935, The Grapes of Wrath -- 1940, How Green Was My Valley -- 1941, and The Quiet Man -- 1952), a feat still unmatched. He was supposedly contentious and mean-spirited, but actors lined up to work for him. His stock company (John Wayne, Harry Carey, Jr., Ward Bond, Mildred Natwick, Maureen O’Hara, Ken Curtis, Ben Johnson, Victor McLaglen, Woody Strode) were a bunch of professionals that could deliver the goods, usually in one take. He tended to downplay his abilities saying once, "Anybody can direct a picture once they know the fundamentals. Directing is not a mystery; it's not an art. The main thing about directing is: photograph the people's eyes."

Their eyes. If you have the opportunity to watch The Searchers, pay special attention to the eyes; where they go, what they take in. Watch chapter 3 for the scene where Ethan is openly staring at his sister-in-law while forgetting his brother is even standing there. In chapter 7, from 13:08 to 13:47, watch the eyes of Ward Bond, Dorothy Jordan, and John Wayne. In 39 seconds, without a single word being spoken, we learn volumes about the three characters. It’s all in the eyes. Harry Carey, Jr., in his superb autobiography Company of Heroes: My Life as an Actor in the John Ford Stock Company, wrote, "When I looked up at [John Wayne] in rehearsal, it was into the meanest, coldest eyes I had ever seen. From day one, Duke was Ethan Edwards. That character seemed built into him, and no other actor, no matter how great his talent, could have played that part as well."

But the character was controversial. Here was John Wayne, the number-one all-time box-office draw, playing for the director that made him a star. Generally typecast as a hero, Wayne made Ethan Edwards into a complex human and a pathetic racist, doomed to be an outsider even to his family. Ethan, not so secretly, covets his brother’s wife. Ethan sets Martin up as a decoy for murderers. Then, he shoots them in the back and steals their money. Throughout the film, you always feel that Ethan is more intent on killing the Indians than rescuing the girl. With the exception of a vague sense of loyalty and dedication, there’s not much to like about Wayne’s character. Ford, the man who helped create the myth of the Western hero, then embodied it in John Wayne, now tears it up and discards it. It was a brave piece of acting on Wayne’s part. Kind of like Tom Hanks offering to play Osama bin Laden.

People new to Ford’s work often don’t know what to make of it. He uses abrupt changes of mood, like in chapter 38 where he takes us from one of Ethan and Marty’s most intense emotional conflicts, then sweeps us onto a dance floor at a wedding. In his Westerns, Indians get short shrift. They are usually faceless warriors, doomed to be shot by the hero,  then fall off their horse to be drug along by their stirrups until they roll into a heap of defeated humanity.

Another Ford trait that drives some people crazy is that he is a sentimentalist in terms of old folk music. Just try to find a Ford film with a funeral where they don’t play "Shall We Gather at the River." Then, in the middle of all this, Ford is likely to bob around from group to group showing us violence followed by a scene of domestic tranquility, then a bar scene where boys will be boys. People accustomed to the strictly linear story telling of today’s action flicks wonder why Ford throws in all the other stuff. Ford’s films require immersion and concentration, not because they are complicated, but because so much is going on, and the stories and characters are so rich. Yet everything is so natural that it appears simple. Deceptive simplicity.

In the early 1970s, a new bunch of maverick filmmakers started talking about The Searchers, calling it a masterpiece. Paul Schrader, John Milius, Wim Wenders, and George Lucas all paid homage to the film. Jean-Luc Godard called it one of the ten best films of all time.

Steven Spielberg claimed to have watched The Searchers more than a dozen times before 1977, the year he made Close Encounters of the Third Kind. Then he watched The Searchers twice while on location for Close Encounters, searching for inspiration. Now, it’s a regular thing. "Before I go off and direct a movie I always look at four films," Spielberg says on his home page: "Seven Samurai, Lawrence of Arabia, It's A Wonderful Life, and The Searchers." Martin Scorsese said, "The dialogue is like poetry! And the changes of expression are so subtle, so magnificent! I see it once or twice a year."

The filmmakers love Ford’s sense of symmetry. The film begins and ends with Ethan and a door. Debbie has to cower in the corner while facing a man that might hurt her and will take her from her family; first, in the person of Scar, then five years later, Ethan. They love how Ford took the "good" guys and "bad" guys and made them alike. Ethan and Scar are both brutal killers, good strategists, and dedicated to hatred for the other’s race. They also both kidnap Debbie and kill the other’s family. They both take scalps. They are, in most ways, two of a kind. So which one is the bad guy?

After the expansion of laws and sentiments for civil rights in the 1960s, it became fashionable in the 1970s to say that, in The Searchers, Ford was apologizing for the bigotry of his prior Westerns. None of this came from Ford himself. It was more as though the passing of time had magically enlightened both Ford and his film. Ford was right wing and pro-USA. His defenders were more left leaning. Could they have been trying to remold Ford to make his politics more palatable? Here are some interesting facts.

Ford made two changes when converting the book to the film. In the book, Martin Pawley is a white boy. In the movie, he’s "one-eighth Cherokee, the rest is Welch and English." That change allowed Ford to keep constant emphasis on Ethan’s racism. The other change from the book refers to the dialogue above where Brad thinks he’s found Lucy. In the book, he recognized Lucy by her hair, not her blue dress. I think that Ford felt a warrior dancing around in a dead girl’s dress was easier to take than one dancing around wearing her scalp. He wanted to keep the focus on Ethan’s brutality and not the Indians. The other important fact to remember is that the Navahos loved Ford and made him a member of the tribe. They gave him the name Natani Nez (Tall Soldier) and presented him with a sacred relic. Clearly, they didn’t feel like he was misrepresenting them.

But was Ford having a change of heart? I don’t know. The question comes up in Carey’s book and he says that he doesn’t know either. Carey thinks that Ford was just trying to tell a good story. Maybe. I think Ford was interested in exploring characters. And Ethan Edwards is definitely a character worth exploring.

The DVD comes in one of those dual-sided affairs with full screen on one side and enhanced widescreen on the other. Any film lover that watches the full-screen side should be sent on an excursion with Ethan Edwards. The widescreen side is beautiful. Other than Leone’s Once Upon a Time in the West, these are the most beautiful pictures of Monument Valley ever. The sound is clear and remains mono, just like it was intended. The extras are a pathetic offering. Those of you that have the deluxe laserdisc set should keep it. It had a wonderful documentary and a four-part promo from The Kaiser Aluminum Hour. I guess they just ran out of space on the DVD because all they include is two of the promos and a trailer. Hopefully, Warner Brothers will come out with a new version that has just the widescreen film and all of the original offerings from the laserdisc. Wouldn’t it be nice if they could add some interviews with the directors listed above that are so enamored of the film?

I had a hard time picking which Ford film to review. I’m equally in love with The Informer, Stagecoach, How Green Was My Valley, My Darling Clementine, The Cavalry Trilogy (Fort Apache, She Wore a Yellow Ribbon, Rio Grande), The Quiet Man, and Mister Roberts. But the moral ambiguity coupled with John Wayne’s superb performance pushed The Searchers into the Collector’s Corner.

...Wes Marshall
wesm@hometheatersound.com

 


PART OF THE SOUNDSTAGE NETWORK -- www.soundstagenetwork.com