HOME THEATER & SOUND -- Feature Article

Cinema Cynergy

March 2003

Stop the Upgrade Madness!

People wanting to upgrade their systems often ask me for advice. They want to know whether they should purchase a component such as a processor or receiver because of its particular feature set, which they fear might be missing something. The simple answer would be to purchase the most up-to-date processor or receiver with all of the currently available features to minimize the chance of obsolescence. But how do you decide when it is the right time to upgrade?

Upgrading just for the sake of upgrading does not make much sense. If you have an old Dolby Pro Logic receiver then you are probably a good candidate for a new receiver. But what if you own a high-quality receiver that has basic Dolby Digital 5.1 decoding and still sounds great? Other than DVD players, no other piece of equipment seems to lose its value faster than a receiver or processor, so don’t expect to get much in return for your old unit. The key is to make sure that you are upgrading for the right reasons and to know what you are getting.

In previous columns I have described many of the latest surround formats and features that are currently available on processors and receivers, but I have refrained from commenting on how I feel they enhance the surround-sound experience. This time, I will describe their benefits so that you can decide for yourself whether it is worth upgrading to these new technologies.

Analog surround

While it seemed as though analog surround formats such as Dolby Pro Logic would disappear with the advent of discrete digital formats such as Dolby Digital and DTS, Dolby Labs recently released Pro Logic II (DPL2), which is basically an enhanced version of the original Pro Logic decoding. The more advanced logic of DPL2 does a better job of spreading the sound among the three front channels so everything doesn’t "collapse" into the center-channel speaker. It also processes the surrounds in stereo instead of mono as with Pro Logic.

There is no doubt that DPL2 sounds significantly better than Pro Logic, and it even works with stereo music sources, although the results are program dependent. Once you listen to DPL2 you will not want to go back to Pro Logic, but you have to ask yourself if you listen to enough two-channel sources such as VHS tapes, laserdiscs, or broadcast television to warrant the upgrade. There are also some receivers and processors, including some older models that have proprietary forms of analog surround processing such as Logic 7 (on Lexicon and Harman/Kardon products), that many people feel are as good as, or even superior to DPL2.

6.1 channels of Extended Surround

Most processors and receivers now have both Dolby Digital Surround EX and DTS-ES processing for extracting an additional back surround channel to give a more enveloping and directional rear soundfield. More expensive THX Certified units even have something called THX Surround EX, which is an enhanced version of these extended-surround processes with more complex bass management, time delays, steering logic, et cetera.

The main drawback to 6.1 systems is that you have to run an extra set of speaker cables to the back of your room and find a place to put the back surround speaker. It is also recommended (and required by THX) that you use two back surround channels to help spread the sound more evenly behind the listeners. Finding the space to position back surrounds properly can be problematic, as they require as much distance from the seating position as the left and right surrounds. You can compensate for this by setting delays for these channels, but if your couch is against the back wall, placing a back surround speaker directly behind or above your head is far from ideal. Make sure that you have the necessary space for the back surround speaker(s) before committing to a 6.1 or 7.1 system. Otherwise, you might be better off sticking with 5.1.

THX

Although it does have proprietary processes such as Timbre Matching, Re-Equalization, and THX Surround EX, THX isn’t really a surround format in the same way as Dolby Digital or DTS. It is more a set of standards devised by the THX division of Lucasfilm to ensure that playback systems reproduce the sound "as intended by the filmmaker." The latest incarnation of THX is dubbed THX Ultra2, which adds THX Music and THX Ultra2 Cinema modes, intended as a simple solution to the myriad 6.1 and 7.1 processing modes available on many processors and receivers. For 5.1 program material, THX recommends choosing either the Ultra2 Cinema or Music modes, which are said to work well with all the discrete digital surround formats.

The option to choose from the many THX sound modes is certainly a luxury, but there is no reason a surround receiver or processor cannot be an exceptional performer even without THX certification. Upgrading a system just to get THX Certified components seems unnecessary; however, if you choose to purchase a high-quality receiver or processor, many are THX Certified anyway, so you will receive it by default.

High-resolution multichannel audio

There has been a lot of buzz about the "format" wars in the audiophile press lately (including some articles that I have written), but let’s face it, not many people other than audiophiles actually care. There is no doubt that SACDs and DVD-As sound better than standard CDs, but to the majority of people, regular 16-bit CDs sound perfectly fine. Also, the decoding of SACDs and DVD-As is built into the player and not the receiver or processor, which is the opposite of what usually occurs with Dolby Digital and DTS processing (a major drawback, which I will get to shortly).

Some SACDs are backward compatible with CD and DVD players, while others are not. Sometimes they are not even multichannel, but are stereo recordings instead. DVD-As are usually compatible with standard DVD-V players, but not with CD players. Many of the albums on both SACD and DVD-A are from obscure record labels by artists that hardly anyone has heard of. Perhaps the worst thing about SACD and DVD-A is that no universal digital connection will allow you to connect your player to your processor or receiver. To get multichannel sound out of your player from SACDs or DVD-As, you must typically use six analog interconnects. Currently only Denon, Meridian, and Pioneer have digital connections that will allow you to send high-resolution digital signals between players and controllers, and they are unique to each company and available only on certain models.

Until SACD and DVD-A titles become more accessible, and all manufacturers agree upon a standard digital connection, high-resolution multichannel audio in any form will not become a widely accepted consumer format.

Component-video switching

People often ask me if a receiver or processor is worth buying when it lacks component-video switching. You may have a satellite box and/or a digital cable box that has component-video outputs, but if you are like me, you only have one source with component-video outputs: a DVD player. I simply connect my DVD player directly to my TV with component-video cables, bypassing the video-switching circuitry of the receiver. Video switching theoretically degrades the video signal, even if it is nearly imperceptible. If you have more than one or two component-video sources, having component-video switching capabilities is something to consider. Otherwise, connecting your component-video sources directly to your TV is a viable and perhaps even a better alternative in terms of picture quality.

Progressive-scan video

This feature is actually part of the video processing built into DVD players, which was once quite rare, but is now included on most players except for the most basic entry-level models. To take advantage of the progressive-scan capabilities of a DVD player, you must have a television that can accept these signals. Not only does the television need to have component-video inputs (progressive-scan signals are only available on component inputs and outputs), but it must also be capable of receiving 480p (progressive) video signals. Many televisions have component-video inputs, but can only accept 480i (interlaced) video signals and not 480p. If you already have a television that can accept 480p video signals, then many inexpensive progressive-scan DVD players out there will allow you to take advantage of this feature.

What are you trying to accomplish?

The main reason for upgrading your system should be to achieve better overall sound and video -- not just to get the latest features. Purchasing a new receiver or processor that has the most up-to-date features and methods of surround processing, but has the same (or perhaps even worse) sound quality than the one it replaces, makes no sense at all. In that case, you would be better off spending the money on improving your speakers, or adding a more powerful amplifier, or perhaps just holding onto that money until you have saved up enough for a more significant and meaningful upgrade.

...Roger Kanno
roger@hometheatersound.com

 


PART OF THE SOUNDSTAGE NETWORK -- www.soundstagenetwork.com