
|
 Sherbourn
5/1500A
Multichannel Amplifier

|
|
|
 |

Description Model:
Sherbourn Technologies 5/1500A
Price: $1999 USD
Dimensions: 17.7"W x 17.7"D x 7"H
Weight: 79 pounds
Warranty: Five years parts and labor
Features
- Monoblock construction
- 400VA toroidal transformer (one per channel)
|

Features (cont'd)
- 20,000 microfarads of capacitance per channel
- 500-square-inch heatsink per channel
- Auto turn on
- Auto biasing circuit
- Balanced XLR and gold-plated RCA inputs
- 8 bipolar output transistors per channel
- 30-amp current capacity per channel
- Detachable IEC power cord
- Anti-clipping circuitry
- 12V DC trigger
|
Attempting to
differentiate one audio product from a sea of competitors is a difficult task. While some
manufacturers choose to wax hyperbolic about features that are as thin as the stickers on
their products' faceplates, Sherbourn Technologies purports to offer the consumer benefits
that are considerably more substantial.
The $1999 5/1500A multichannel power amplifier stands as a
prime example of this North Billerica, Massachusetts-based companys philosophy:
start with a solid design principle that dictates that the final product will require
fewer in-born compromises. For Sherbourn amplifiers, this lies in what Sherbourn
co-founders Ron Fone and Engne Tang refer to as true monoblock construction.
Technical details
Before examining Sherbourns concept of monoblock
construction, lets look at your average surround-sound receiver. Almost all of them
utilize the latest DSP chip, exhibit tight build quality, and boast 100Wpc for up to seven
channels. Unfortunately, not all "watts" are created equal. And, despite what
the specs might say, a thousand dollars wont likely buy you an amplifier that can
simultaneously sustain 100W of high current and voltage into multiple channels, across
varying frequencies and impedances. The chances are good that our hypothetical receiver
shares power supplies or transformers among its multiple channels. This means that it
might not deliver all its power into all its channels for sustained periods. Although the
chance of needing 100W into all of a receiver's channels might be slim, there are times
when one channel's requirements might prevent another from delivering the power the signal
dictates -- and a clipped signal can permanently damage a loudspeaker.
One solution would be to use a completely isolated
amplifier for each channel. This is common in cost-no-object systems, where each amplifier
would be a completely separate unit referred to as a monoblock. A few manufacturers
make multichannel amplifiers based on this same concept -- there are even a few receivers
built that way -- but Ron Fone and Engne Tang believe theyve one-upped their
competition with Sherbourn's five-channel 5/1500A (a seven-channel version of this
amplifier and companion processor is due out this summer). Most affordable multichannel
products use a shared power supply (transformer and capacitor bank) to drive monoblock
electronics. Sherbourn, however, furnishes each channels electronics with an
individual power supply. Fone and Tang acknowledge that this same monoblock approach is
offered in more expensive competing products, but by remaining specialized, manufacturing
their products overseas, and employing the same monoblock module throughout their entire
product line, they are able to offer the technology at an unprecedented price point.
The beast
The 5/1500A is rated to deliver 200W into 8 ohms (and 300W
into 4 ohms) with all five channels driven simultaneously. Its casework wont bowl
you over with expensive sheet metal or a beefy faceplate. What might take you by surprise,
however, is its weight. At close to 80 pounds, the 5/1500A isnt easy to lug around.
The absence of dedicated handles and lack of wiggle-room in its carton make setting it up
a little awkward. A sturdy rack or amplifier stand is an absolute necessity for this
beast.
Around back, four rubber feet allow the unit to stand on
end without crushing its high-quality balanced and unbalanced audio inputs and speaker
connections. Yes, you read that right: in addition to single-ended RCA-type inputs, the
5/1500A has XLR connections. According to Sherbourn, this affords greater flexibility in
the units placement by allowing long cable runs from processor to amp. The XLR
connections are inherently better at preventing hum or RF-induced noise from clouding the
signal.
Around front, a florescent-blue power LED gives the amp an
upscale appearance without being distracting. Well, at least it wasnt distracting to
me. My son, however, was drawn to the LED and power switch like a fly to a zapper --
making my wife wonder where the sound went when he experimented with the nickel-sized
switch.
Under the 5/1500A's well-ventilated top plate, five
completely independent mono assemblies suggest where Sherbourn spent the majority of their
budget. As advertised, each module sports its own double-donut-sized 400VA transformer,
20,000 microfarads of capacitance, and robust aluminum heatsink. Less conspicuous are the
multiple bipolar output transistors that populate each channel. According to Tang, using
eight 250V transistors not only affords the amp increased stability into reactive and
low-impedance loads, but also, in conjunction with the separate transformers and plentiful
heatsinks, contributes to the modules' superior thermal performance.
In class A and A/B amplifiers, a good deal of energy is
lost to heat. Sherbourn maintains that the 5/1500As individual power supplies
contribute to a cooler thermal environment than an amplifier that shares facilities, since
each supply is tasked only with the demands of a single speaker.
But can this beast carry a tune?
Having an amplifier capable of a kilowatt of power into an
8-ohm load doesnt necessarily mean that you're going to be playing music loud.
Typically, loud music played through efficient speakers will consume no more than a few
constant watts per channel. Yet enormous amounts of power will give you the
headroom to handle musical peaks and extremely wide dynamic shifts without strain. This
quality was quite audible in the listening tests.
Chapter 2 of Jurassic Park 3, for example, gives us
a cell-phone-gabbing Udesky walking up to his associates, just as they test-fire a large
gun. Simultaneously, Udesky finishes his phone conversation, the gun is fired, and a plane
carcass is destroyed. The sound was remarkably clear and dramatic. The Sherbourn 5/1500A
showed no signs of compressed dynamics -- it dealt easily with the dynamic swings and
maintained its output without a hint of distortion. This rendered scenes, such as the
battle between the Spinosaurus and T-Rex in chapter 6, with shocking realism.
Saving Private Ryan is filled with many examples of
deep bass, such as the scene where tanks rumble into the village during the films
finale. Bass, in particular, is an area where the 5/1500A easily outperforms most
receiver-based systems Ive heard, and, frankly, it does so to a point where using a
sub with speakers like the NHT ST4 almost seems completely unnecessary. The Sherbourn's
control over bass was tight and authoritative.
Speaker systems from NHT and Triad both benefited from the
Sherbourns substantial power. But it was the NHT ST4 home-theater speaker system
that seemed to be the better match for the 5/1500As silky, laid-back midrange and
high frequencies. The combination of my Harman/Kardon receiver and the NHT system
displayed an uncomfortable amount of sibilance during chapter 1 of Unbreakable.
Connecting the Sherbourn to the H/Ks preamp outputs removed the sibilance and
allowed the amp to dig deep into the ST4s bass capabilities. The 5.1 image produced
by the NHTs was also excellent when driven by the 5/1500A. Seamless front-to-back pans and
a hyper-evocative ambience gave me goose bumps while watching Final Fantasy: The
Spirits Within.
The Sherbourns refined sonics also served less
action-centric films well. The rich Dolby Digital mix on Requiem for a Dream was
more realistic through the 5/1500A than with the dimensionally flatter presentation of the
Harman/Kardons internal amplifiers. The scene where Sara Goldfarbs
refrigerator comes alive during a drug-induced hallucination was frightening in its
transient detail and clarity. Everything in the 5.1soundstage felt more tangible and
focused with the Sherbourn amp.
I experienced less visceral energy when Triads Silver
Monitors took over. Music from Howard Shores brilliant Lord of the Rings
soundtrack [WEA 48238-2] conveyed less drama and sweetness in the treble and midrange with
the two-way bookshelves. Guitar and percussion on the title track of Suzanne Vegas Songs
of Red and Gray [Universal 493111] lacked the shimmering overtones that gave the
recording more dimension. Detail was still there, mind you -- though not as forward as
with the NHTs. For instance, the decay of piano and the wispiness of Sunny Sumters
vocals had less of an edge on track 4 of Mapleshades Music Festival [Unapix
Entertainment UPX 72032].
The Sherbourns interaction with the Triads confirmed
my overall impressions of its sound: a darker-than-neutral timbre. It displayed good
detail across the frequency range, presenting vocals with good weight, and bass with
healthy body and energy. It didnt quite have the most vivid soundstage or
hard-hitting slam Ive experienced, though.
Beast versus
I took delivery of the five-channel B&K AVR305 (younger
brother to the Reviewers
Choice-awarded AVR307) at the end of my evaluation. And despite obvious differences,
this receiver competes quite well with separates-based systems. Purchase a 5/1500A and you
still need a processor and quality interconnects to get the AVR305s functionality.
But the total price for both would probably rise above the $3000 retail of the AVR305.
Thats the price you pay for power.
Which amplifier sounded better was a question best
left to individual taste. The B&K had more zip and slam and seemed to have a better
balance across the frequency spectrum. The Sherbourn tended to accentuate midrange
elements, such as voices, over other portions of a performance, which benefited vocal
intelligibility.
The B&K also seemed to exhibit a more natural rate of
decay. By comparison, the Sherbourns slight lack of sparkle made bells and cymbals
sound slightly flatter as their clinks and splashes faded away. The Triads, in particular,
sounded more alive with the AVR305, while the NHTs favored the better qualities of the
Sherbourn. The Sherbourn 5/1500A was definitely more adept at driving more lively
speakers.
The Sherbourn had a slightly shy, yet immensely powerful,
sonic signature. In my evaluation, the Sherbourn gave a larger-than-life presentation to
everything I listened to. During Jurassic Park 3, the B&K made the
dinosaurs footsteps seem like they were going to make a hole in my floor. By
comparison the 5/1500A had more weight, but less attack -- as if the floor was flexing
under the dinos weight, rather than splintering under its step.
So will this beast fly?
Technology and competition in Sherbourns market space
has reached a point where you either have a well-built amplifier that can differentiate
itself from the crowd, or you have a dead product. Fone and Tang know this, but they also
know what it takes to build a good product. They also genuinely believe in giving
the customer the most for his hard-earned dollars, and in my opinion theyve
accomplished this. From an engineering/cost standpoint the 5/1500A is an impressive piece
of gear that has the effortless strength and the silky-smooth demeanor of a ballerina over
the speed and force of a football player. Its construction offers features that
differentiate it from the crowd. Indeed, of the products currently available, I know of
few that offer the same design features, and impressive power and performance, as the
5/1500A at anywhere approaching its price.
| Review
System |
| Speakers - NHT ST4 (mains), SB3
(surrounds), SC1 (center), SubOne (subwoofer), Triad Silver home-theater speaker system |
| Receivers
- Harman/Kardon AVR 510, B&K AVR305 |
| Sources - Panasonic RP56 DVD player,
Marantz DR6050 CD recorder/player |
| Cables
- BetterCables |
| Monitor - Mitsubishi WT-46809
rear-projection widescreen monitor (with Duvetyne modification) |
|
|