
|

Panasonic
PT-AE900U LCD Projector

|
|
|
 |

DescriptionModel:
PT-AE900U
Price: $3199 USD
Dimensions: 13.2"W x 3.7"H x 10.6"D
Weight: 7.9 pounds
Warranty: One year parts and labor |

Features
- Three Epson D5 LCD panels
- 1280x720 resolution
- 5500:1 Dynamic Contrast Ratio
- 1100 ANSI lumens brightness
- Automatic iris for improved contrast and black levels
- Smooth Screen technology to eliminate screen-door effect
- Cinema Color Management technology
- Vertical and horizontal lens shift
- 2.0x optical zoom lens
- Six selectable video inputs
- Front, rear, ceiling modes
|
Dont let anyone
tell you otherwise: Size matters. That 27" TV youve been watching for the past
ten years is inadequate. If you doubt this, consider that the optimal viewing distance
recommended by THX is 1.5 times the width of a widescreen picture. A 27" TV is
22" wide, which makes the THX viewing distance 33". How far away are you
sitting?
If you really want that all-out theater experience, the
average flat panel wont quite get you there. If you sit 10 from the screen, it
would take four 46" flat panels to fill the space required to meet the THX
specification. A 72" DLP rear-projection TV will set you back five grand and still
come up well short of the 92" diagonal the spec calls for at this distance. A few
years down the road things may change, but if you want a really big picture at something
less than the cost of a car, youre going to be looking at projectors.
The first thing to understand is that projectors are not
for everyone. For one thing, projectors make lousy TVs. Blowing up a low-resolution
digital cable or satellite feed to 92" or larger will make it look fuzzy, at best.
This, too, will change as more high-definition programming becomes available, but as of
now, most programming doesnt cut it when projected onto a large screen.
Another issue is that projector lamps typically cost more
than $300 each and last only 2000 to 3000 hours. If your household is like the many that
use a projector as their primary source of television, that means youll need to
replace the lamp once or twice a year.
Finally, because a relatively small amount of light can
significantly wash out a projected image, a projector needs to be in a light-controlled
space. Unless you like living in a cave, youll want something else for daytime
viewing. Still, projectors are currently the only technology that can provide an
8-diagonal or larger picture for an entry fee of around $2000.
Sizing things up
The Panasonic PT-AE900U ($3199) is the latest in a series
of LCD projectors produced for the home-theater market. Panasonics last generation,
the PT-AE700, broke new ground with a number of features that quickly made it the
best-selling LCD projector in the world, and no wonder -- its extensive lens-shift
capabilities and long zoom lens allowed it to be placed just about anywhere in the room
with no serious degradation of picture quality. The PT-AE900U is a significant but
incremental improvement over the PT-AE700.
Lens shift, commonly found in LCD projectors but rare with
mid-priced DLP projectors, allows you to shift the images position on the screen up
or down and to the left or right. Also, most DLP projectors have a picture offset that
places the top of the picture 10-15" below the lens of a ceiling-mounted projector.
If, like me, you have a low ceiling, this eliminates a huge chunk of the sub-$3000
projector market from consideration.
Another unusual feature of the PT-AE900U is its 2.0x zoom
lens, instead of the more common 1.2x or 1.3x lens. This permits a much greater range of
placement possibilities. For example, filling a 100"-diagonal screen with a 1.2x zoom
lens might require you to place the projector 11 to 13 from the screen. The
Panasonics 2.0x zoom allows it to be placed anywhere from 10 to 20 away
from the same size screen. These two factors will resolve all but the most difficult
installation issues. They also allow the PT-AE900U to be mounted on a shelf at the back of
the room, which will further reduce installation cost and complexity.
The big drawbacks of the LCD technology are poor contrast
ratio, insufficient black levels, and the screen-door effect. In addressing the first two,
Panasonic has resorted to some technical trickery to increase the perceived contrast and
black levels beyond what the LCD technology is, at present, technically capable of. It
works by judging the light levels in various parts of the picture and adjusting the iris
opening and lamp output 60 times per second to produce the best possible combination of
black levels and contrast. While the PT-AE900Us actual contrast is nowhere near the
5500:1 claimed, its perceived contrast is quite high.
The screen-door effect is the apparent grid created by the
black spaces between the pixels, which produces the impression that youre watching
the picture through a screen door. Im particularly susceptible; I can see pixel
structure from farther away than most, even with the better DLP projectors. To address the
screen-door effect, Panasonic has come up with Smooth Screen technology, which smooths the
transition between pixels, virtually eliminating any visible pixel structure when viewed
from any reasonable distance. Some people complain that Smooth Screen makes the picture
less sharp, but I see little difference with HD material (more on this below).
Setting up a projector is never a piece of cake, but the
PT-AE900Us lens shift and 2.0x zoom lens go a long way toward making the job as
simple as possible. Some have complained that the lens shifts joystick control is
finicky. I found it a bit touchy, but once its adjusted, you shouldnt have to
fiddle with it again. If you mount the PT-AE900U on the ceiling, the biggest issues will
likely be getting the mount aligned properly and running the cables to the projector. I
use a Chief universal mount, which is very well made and thought out and easily worth the
extra cost over a cheaper mount.
With the PT-AE900Us image positioned on the screen,
it was now time to calibrate the picture for best color, contrast, etc. Using Cinema1 mode
projected on a plain white screen, the PT-AE900Us colors were pretty accurate right
out of the box, though a little on the green/yellow side of neutral. After a basic setup
with the AVIA test DVD, I compared the Panasonic to my ISF-calibrated Hitachi
46F500 HDTV rear projector. I rate the PT-AE900Us color accuracy to be at least the
Hitachis equal. I then improved the PT-AE900Us performance with some
additional tweaking. (A good place to start would be the PT-AE900U tweak thread
on the AVS Forum, though the settings listed there depend somewhat on which screen you
use.)
The noise from ventilation fans has been an annoyance with
projectors from the start, though these have gotten quieter in recent years. The
Panasonics fan was very quiet when I placed the projector on a table, louder when I
hung it from the ceiling. This was because the fan runs faster to counteract the higher
temperatures found near a rooms ceiling. Though I never found the noise particularly
objectionable, I could hear it during all but a films loudest sequences.
In terms of connection options, theres little to be
concerned about. There are two sets of component inputs, an HDMI connection, a VGA
connector to plug a computer into, and one each of S-video and composite connections.
There are no trigger inputs or outputs, which can be useful for controlling electrically
powered screens. Also, there is only one remote eye, on the projectors front. A
second eye, on the rear, would have been useful: a remote emitter could have been mounted
to it so that a remote controls commands could reliably control the projector
without the user having to turn the remote around toward the front of the projector. One
thing that baffles me is why Panasonic didnt use a standard IEC connector for the
power cord. Their proprietary connection precludes the use of any custom aftermarket or
short DIY power cords. It looks as if Ill be cutting down Panasonics stock
cord so Im not left with 5 of cord coiled behind the projector.
Now, thats a really big . . .
. . . Kong. Watching Peter Jacksons King Kong
as projected by the PT-AE900U, one of the first things I noticed was that the close-ups of
Kong and Naomi Watts were very sharp while showing no hint of pixel structure. This was
Panasonics Smooth Screen technology coming into play -- I generally see some
pixel structure when sitting 10 away from my 92" screen. But with the
PT-AE900U, I didnt begin to see pixel structure until I was about 5 from the
screen. Some people complain that Smooth Screen softens the picture, but after examining
the images thrown by the Panasonic and some competing LCD projectors, I tend to think that
the more defined pixel structure of those other makes was responsible for adding some
artificial sharpness that isnt there in the source material. If Smooth Screen
softened the picture, then this softening would also have been evident with true HD
material, and that was anything but the case. The PT-AE900Us perceived contrast was
very good. In King Kong, the texture of Hayes black coat was plainly visible
in the scene where he speaks to Jimmy about getting an education.
Another occasional issue with LCD projectors has been
vertical banding. This manifests itself as faint vertical lines in bright, evenly lit
scenes, such as the blue background of the ocean in Finding Nemo. Vertical banding
can be quite distracting, but Im happy to report there was never a hint of it with
the PT-AE900U, and probably isnt with the vast majority of the latest generation of
LCD projectors. However, recognizing that vertical banding may still be a problem with
some individual units, Panasonic has provided flicker and panel adjustment options in the
PT-AE900Us service menu, and appears to be handling any other vertical-banding
problems as warranty issues.
The PT-AE900Us internal scaler left a lot to be
desired. Feed it a 480i signal from the component outputs of your average DVD player and
youll likely be disappointed by a uniformly soft picture. During the course of this
review I used as sources the Panasonic DVD-S97 and Oppo 971H DVD players, both of which
offer conversion to the Panasonics native 720p resolution. The results were far
superior to the projectors internal processor. Star Wars: Episode III -- Revenge
of the Sith revealed a significantly softer picture from the component outputs of the
Panasonic DVD-S97 than did the same players 720p HDMI output. The moral: If
youre considering buying a PT-AE900U, pad your budget with another $200 to buy a
topnotch scaling DVD player. I highly recommend either of the two mentioned here.
During uniformly dark sequences, such as the opening scene
of Revenge of the Sith, the PT-AE900Us black levels were very good, though
they didnt quite approach my Hitachi RPTVs deep inkiness. Where the
Panasonics automatic iris faltered somewhat was in sequences where there are large
blocks of dark and light in the same frame, such as when General Grievous ship
arrives at Utapau. This was evident as crushed black levels, which resulted in fewer and
dimmer stars visible in the background. Nobody would notice without making direct
comparisons, but most DLP projectors handle this scene somewhat better.
Those who think the PT-AE900Us images from DVDs are
soft need to watch the quarter scene from Driven. I hate this movie, but
its one of the better DVD transfers out there. Once the projector was properly set
up and fed a signal from a good DVD player, any hint of softness was the fault of the
source material, not the projector. With the Panasonic fed a digital signal via the
Oppos DVI output, this scene was razor-sharp and looked nearly like HD -- so sharp
that I began to wonder if the limitations of DVD images on large screens are due less to
the formats inherent lack of resolution than to the very poor mastering of most
DVDs. Thats not to say that HD still isnt drastically superior to DVD. But if
HD DVD and Blu-ray masterings turn out to be as poor as a lot of DVDs, we wont
see much improvement from the new formats.
However, where the PT-AE900U really shone was with true
high-definition material, such as that found on the Discovery Channels Equator
and Insectia shows. Any doubts I might have had about the sharpness of the
Panasonics picture were resolved in the blink of an eye. HD material was as sharp
through the PT-AE900U as through any other projector Ive seen. If Smooth Screen was
softening the picture, it would have been evident on HD broadcasts, and it wasnt.
Ive spent the last few years marveling at the resolution and lifelike appearance of
HD on my 46" Hitachi RPTV, but even that hadnt prepared me for what HD could
look like on a 92" screen. The image was so detailed and lifelike that I found it
hard to imagine how the picture could get much better. There was something disturbing
about seeing a 70" cockroach crawl across the wall 10 from my seat.
The big finish
The Panasonic PT-AE900U gives the home-theater owner who
wants a lot of installation flexibility a level of performance previously associated only
with midrange DLP units. I continue to be amazed at the detail, depth, and color fidelity
of the PT-AE900Us images -- not to mention their size.
Id argue that the PT-AE900Us list price of
$3199 is too high, but no one will be paying list. Retail prices are always subject
to change, but, as of this writing, the PT-AE900Us street price has dropped to about
$1900, with Panasonic offering an additional $400 rebate. At $1900, the PT-AE900U is a
good deal; at $1500, its an amazing deal. Never before has this combination
of performance and flexibility been available at anywhere near this price.
| Review
System |
| Speakers - Mirage M-460
(mains), PSB Stratus C5 (center), PSB Alpha AV Mite (surrounds) |
| Preamplifier-Processors
- Anthem AVM 20, Monoprice HDX-501 HDMI switcher |
| Amplifiers - Rotel RB-976,
Chiro C-300 |
| Sources
- Panasonic DVD-S97 DVD player, Oppo OPDV971H DVD player, Sony SAT-HD200 DirecTV receiver,
Adcom GCD-600 CD player |
| Cables - Analysis Plus,
Audio Magic, Straight Wire, Monster Cable |
| Monitor
- Hitachi 46F500 rear-projection HDTV |
|
|