
|
 Energy
C-C3 / C-R3 / S10.2
Home-Theater Speaker System

|
|
|
 |

Description Model:
C-C3 LCR speakers
Price: $600 USD each
Dimensions: 22.9"H x 7.75"W x 11.5"D
Weight: 30 pounds each
Model: C-R3 surrounds
Price: $300 USD each
Dimensions: 12.0"W x 9.7"H x 6.3"D
Weight: 13 pounds each
Model: S10.2 subwoofer
Price: $500 USD each
Dimensions: 15.75"W x 15.75"H x 17.3"D
Weight: 33 pounds each
System Price: $4000 USD ($2900 for a 5.1
system)
Warranty: Five years parts and labor on
speakers, one year on subwoofer |

Features
- Magnetically shielded
- Chambered 1" aluminum-dome tweeter
- Two 2" aluminum midrange drivers
- Two 6.5" Homopolymer woofers with NBR/SBR surrounds
(C-C3)
- One 4.5" Homopolymer woofer with NBR/SBR surround
(C-R3)
- Black ash or Canadian maple/silver vinyl finish (C-C3 and
S10.2)
- Matte black, white, or Canadian maple/silver finish (C-R3)
- 10" injection-molded polypropylene woofer with rubber
surround and 1.5" voice coil (S10.2)
- 150W RMS, 600W peak MOSFET amplifier (S10.2)
- Dual 2"-diameter flared front vents (S10.2)
- Audio/Video EQ (S10.2)
- Variable low-pass filter (50-100Hz) (S10.2)
- RCA and speaker-level inputs (S10.2)
- Front-mounted controls (S10.2)
|
Late last year, a
group of SoundStage! Network writers visited the facilities of Audio Products
International, the parent company of Energy Speaker Systems. While touring the design
center, we came upon a somewhat unconventional-looking center-channel speaker.
The C-C3 is not just a center-channel, though it was
designed to function in that application -- according to Energy, its a
"multi-purpose speaker." Whats different about it is that Energy has added
a pair of 2" midrange drivers at 45-degree angles to the tweeter. It looked to me
like an unusual design that should do interesting things for dispersion. The speakers
werent far enough along for us to listen to them at the time, but when Energy asked
if Id be interested in reviewing them, I eagerly accepted a 7.1-channel system based
on the new design.
Description and setup
The system Energy shipped consisted of three C-C3 speakers
to cover the front, four C-R3 surrounds, two S10.2 subwoofers, and retails for $4000 USD.
The C-C3 is relatively large as center-channels go, but its not physically
intrusive. In fact, I found the simple black-ash vinyl cabinet and silver front baffle
quite attractive. They were equally good-looking with the grilles removed, showing off the
aluminum-dome tweeter, and silver Homopolymer woofers. My wife, not generally fond of the
grilleless look, said several times that she liked the high-tech appearance of the C-C3
sans grilles. Instead of the standard posts or headlocks, the grilles on the C-C3 are held
on by small magnets -- a small thing, but it made the grilles so easy to remove and
replace that I found myself more likely to leave them off for serious listening.

C-R3 with and without grille.
|
The C-R3 is the most configurable surround
speaker Ive used to date. Its driver complement consists of a small woofer and
tweeter on the front baffle and a 2" extended-range midrange -- the same as used in
the C-C3 -- on each of its side baffles. The side-firing drivers can be switched between
dipole or bipole operation, and you can control the volume of the side drivers relative to
those on the front panel. Energy provides recommendations for settings based on the
difference in distance to the listening position between your front speakers and
surrounds. These seemed to work pretty well, with generally good results in both my large
and small listening rooms. I eventually tweaked the settings in both rooms to better suit
my needs, but I suspect most users will find Energys suggested settings more than
acceptable.
The S10.2 subwoofer is more conventional, except that its
Level, Crossover, and Video EQ controls are mounted on its front. I found this handy while
setting things up, but also found that teenagers are more likely to mess with your
carefully calibrated settings if the controls are in plain view. (Hint to manufacturers:
Software-driven setup with configuration locks, in place of mechanical controls, might be
a big selling point for parents of teens.) The inputs on the rear of the S10.2 consist of
two RCA jacks and a full set of binding-post speaker-level inputs and outputs.
Surprisingly, the RCA jacks are not a stereo pair. Instead, one input uses the internal
crossover while the other bypasses it. An internal 150W amplifier powers the S10.2s
10" driver.
I tested the sound and versatility of the Energy system in
both of my listening rooms. In the larger room, I placed the left and right C-C3s on
24" stands pointed in toward the listening position, and the center C-C3 atop the TV
and pointed down slightly. The C-R3 surrounds were mounted on the rear and side walls
about 6.5 off the floor, the side speakers directly in line with the primary
listening position and the rears about 4 behind me and about 8 apart. I
finally settled on a configuration in which the side surrounds were set to bipole
operation, the rears to dipole.
I quickly fell in love with the configurability of the
C-R3s as I fine-tuned each of them to meet specific placement criteria. After trying
several options, I ended up with the S10.2 subwoofers about 3 from each of the
rooms front corners. The smaller room was set up similarly, but with the side
surrounds set at full dipole and without the rear surrounds and second sub.
Sound
Saving Private Ryan began the education process that
convinced me of the usefulness of such highly configurable surrounds as the C-R3. I had
the system set up in the large listening room with the side surrounds set to bipole
operation, as suggested by Energy, but when I moved them into the small room, I found the
speakers too easily gave away their locations with these settings, and so switched them
over to dipole operation. This produced the most expansive soundfield in the small room
without the speakers drawing undue attention to themselves. Once the final adjustments
were made, the system performed beautifully, with completely seamless side-to-side and
front-to-back pans. The audio images of bullets whizzing past my head were as believable
as it could be in the absence of the real thing.
The dispersion characteristics of the C-C3 during Rush
Hour 2 were impressive. Other than some minor rolloff of the upper frequencies, there
was little difference between the sound as heard from directly in front of the speakers
and from standing almost completely to one side. In this area, where many traditional
center-channels falter, Energys new design pays huge dividends for people seated far
off to one side of center.
The explosion in the films opening scene was
thunderous without being too boomy -- a good start -- and the tonal quality of the S10.2
sub was spot-on during the karaoke scene. I noticed in several scenes that the sounds of
cars passing in front of the camera maintained a perfectly even tone as they were panned
from one speaker to another. Most systems center-channel speakers vary enough from
the left and right models that I hear slight differences during such pans. Not with the
Energy system.
In Almost Famous, the concert scenes were as
enveloping and coherent as anything Ive heard in my system, but the dual subs
werent quite up to the admittedly tough standard set by the Hsu Research VTF-3 in my
large room. There was a noticeable boominess to the bass when pushed hard in this room,
something the VTF-3 took in stride. This turned out to be a simple case of too much space
to fill with not enough muscle. Once Id moved the system to the small listening
room, the S10.2 tightened up dramatically. It still wasnt as defined as the VTF-3,
but held its own and was much easier to place.
If youre looking for something a little different
musically, check out Koby Israelites Dance of the Idiots [Tzadik 7179]. This
odd mix of traditional Jewish music and heavy metal somehow works for me, though I admit
that electric bass guitars and kick drum do not seem to be natural ingredients to mix with
accordions, flugelhorns, and didgeridoos. But the albums mix of classical and rock
instruments intrigued me enough that I bought it. An excellent example is "Battersea
Blues," in which a variety of percussion instruments are mixed with clarinet,
didgeridoo, melodica, and electric guitar to produce a tune unlike anything Im
familiar with. The Energy C-C3 never missed a beat, reproducing every instrument with
unwavering accuracy and neutrality. A sound akin to that of running water runs through
much of the song -- I swear I could hear the water flowing down the front of the speakers!
This interesting effect would be lost with many speakers. All other instruments were
perfectly locked into their own individual spaces.
One recording I never tire of hearing is Holly Coles
Temptation [Alert 81026]. If you know this CD, you know that "Train Song"
can get a bit ugly if your subwoofer isnt up to the task. By the time I got around
to listening to this CD, I had the Energy system set up in the small room; I thought for
sure "Train Song" would trip up the single S10.2, but I was wrong. It managed to
rattle a picture on the wall while retaining good definition and tonal quality.
One advantage of the Energys extremely wide
dispersion pattern was that I could wander around the room and hear very little shift in
tonal quality -- but when I sat in the sweet spot, I was rewarded with pinpoint imaging
and soundstaging that I couldnt hear when sitting way off to one side. This was
evidenced by "I Dont Wanna Grow Up," in which the lower notes on the piano
seem to cover much of the front of the room while Coles voice is locked on dead
center, the acoustic bass just behind her on the right.
The Energy system kicked up a little dust with the SACD
multichannel version of Pink Floyds Dark Side of the Moon [Capitol 82136].
For the most part, this disc does a nice job of adding appropriate ambience without too
many gimmicky effects. A nice example is "Brain Damage" -- the effects are
mostly ambient, except for that laughing voice floating about the room. Its a
perfect example of what can be done to add emotional impact with multichannel music, and
why it might be more important than ever to have a well-matched set of five or more
speakers in your audio system. Of course, if were listening to Dark Side, we
must evaluate "Time." Again, the excellent sonic match of the Energy speakers
helped to lay out an entirely believable stage, upon which the clocks were set. Except for
one clock positioned fully in the left surround speaker, the timepieces seemed to come
from everywhere at once, each of them from a specific position where there was no
speaker.
Comparison
The Energy system produced one of the most coherent
soundfields Ive ever heard in either of my theaters. For some time now, the leader
for coherence in my house has been the $1546 5.1-channel Paradigm
Esprit v.3-based system -- but the Energy C-C3/C-R3 system improved on this with three
identical front speakers and very closely matched surrounds. The C-C3 could hold its own
down into the mid-40Hz range, though with a bit less weight than the Paradigm. Where the
Esprit is good to below 40Hz, the Energy held sway with a more transparent top end, better
detail, and transient response throughout the upper midrange. Soundstaging and imaging
were nearly equal, the Energy system adding a bit more depth to the soundstage.
The S10.2 subwoofer was about the equal of the Paradigm
PDR-12 in trading off smaller size for volume. In my small room, I was easily able to
attain upper-20Hz extension with a single S10.2 at reasonably offensive volume levels.
However, I was never quite happy with the dual subs in my large listening room, where they
would get boomy and lose definition during loud passages; there, I found the Hsu Research
VTF-3 a better fit. In the small room, however, the Hsu sub can get a little overwhelming;
a single S10.2 handled this space nicely. Its also a lot easier to find room for an
S10.2 than for some of the larger subs Ive auditioned.
Conclusion
The Energy C-C3 and C-R3 are excellent home-theater values.
Ive heard nothing else in my system that approaches their combination of
soundstaging, clarity at all volume levels, overall system coherence, and soundfield
development. The success of this setup derives from the close sonic match of all seven
speakers, the wide dispersion of the front channels, and the unsurpassed configurability
of the surrounds. The S10.2 should be a fine match for rooms of small to medium size,
though some competing subs will provide deeper extension and higher output levels in
larger rooms. The bottom line? Anyone building a high-quality audio/video system should
definitely take a close look at this Energy speaker system.
| Review
System |
| Receivers/Processors - Anthem AVM 20, Onkyo
TX-DS696 |
| Amplifiers
- Chiro C-300 (for front speakers), Rotel RB-976 (for surrounds) |
| Sources - Sony DVP-NS755V DVD player, Adcom
GCD-600 CD changer, JVC HR-S3600U S-VHS VCR, RCA DirecTV receiver, Panasonic CP72 DVD
player, Sony HD200 DirecTV receiver |
| Cables -
Analysis Plus, Audio Magic, Straight Wire, Monster Cable |
| Monitor - Hitachi 46F500 |
|
|