Kevin Costner made his mark in the eighties
and the early nineties with Bull Durham, Field of Dreams, The
Untouchables, and his Oscar-winning breakthrough Dances with Wolves. After
which he used his newfound fame to produce and star in some notoriously expensive bombs.
Once the smoke cleared, this once bankable star began taking on roles meant to resurrect
his past successes. Films like For Love of the Game and Message in a Bottle
did little but offer an easy target for critics. The fact Costner still has a career is a
testament to either persistence or dumb luck. Even so, why Hollywood still allows him to
have creative control over a production is a mystery, given that more bankable stars have
been ostracized for less.
Now I really dont care how many lackluster films Costner chooses to produce or
star in. What does bother me though is how a compelling film like Thirteen Days can
become hobbled by what I observed to be an overblown self-serving performance. Watching
this film, one may get the idea that Special Assistant to the President, Kenneth
ODonnell, was more instrumental in preventing a war than either JFK or his brother
the Attorney General. Historical facts about ODonnells involvement during this
trying time were, by the filmmakers own admission, not well documented. And while
theres always the chance that Costner was being as true to ODonnells
character as possible, my gut was telling me that there was a little too much of
Costners ego in the interpretation.
Its October 1962 and a United States spy plane photographs some little cigar-like
shapes off the coast of Florida on the island of Cuba. Closer inspection reveals that
these are not top-shelf vegueros but tactical medium-range nuclear weapons. With
this revelation in hand, the White House goes into a state of alert. President Kennedy
wants answers but also wants to refrain from any knee-jerk reaction that could push the
nation into a position of starting World War III.
Not surprising, and in relatively formulaic fashion, the military is made to look like
a bunch of blood-thirsty war mongers. If Costners "hired heavy"
performance shot out one foot of this film, the farcical portrayals of those generals by
Kennedys side took a toe off the other. One has to believe that at least a few of
those men were genuinely struggling with difficult choices and not simply looking to blow
Cuba off the map. For filmmakers to make such negative generalizations is nothing less
than irresponsible and disrespectful of those men who would give their lives to defend our
nation.
Those two flaws notwithstanding, what remains of Thirteen Days is a rather
competent thriller. Sequences involving U.S. blockades attempting to stop Russian ships
from reaching Cuba, spy planes entering Cuba with a clear risk of being shot down, and a
plethora of politically botched near misses added a measure of consistent tension
throughout this film. Also worth mentioning were the excellent jobs both Bruce Greenwood
and Steven Culp did as John and Robert Kennedy. Not only were their performances more
subtle than Mr. Costners, but their vocal intonations seemed second nature, while
Costners hackneyed "Kennedian accent" made me wince every time.
While Im not sure why the "Infinitifilm" moniker was chosen over their
"Platinum" label, New Line Cinema continues their streak and produces a
consistent, feature-packed DVD. Allowing the end user a choice of whether to view the
extras within the context of the film or as stand-alone elements, the Infinitifilm
treatment offered everything from educational historical info to behind-the-scenes
tidbits. Also included were two commentaries as well as a 48-minute documentary on the
crisis.
Video quality was rich and colorful except for the ugly MPEG artifacts apparent within
some of the interiors. A rather phony-looking exterior replica of the White House stood
out like a sore thumb. I found the Dolby Digital soundtrack was what you would expect for
a film of this type. Surround information logically filled in when planes flew threw the
air or military action took center stage, but it wasnt what one would call
exceptional or all that visceral.
Producing a good film is a formidable task. Creating a film based on real-life
incidents is even more so, since the actions of its characters need to be credible and
sympathetic in the absence of fiction. I had no problem believing Bruce Greenwoods
JFK or Mr. Culps RFK because they offered individuals that didnt come across
as caricatures. Mr. Costners performance, by comparison, just seemed too stilted to
be convincing and too "Costner" to be taken seriously, which begs the question
of where Gary Sinise or Ed Harris is when you need them.