You would need to be as blind as a bat not
to think that Max Shreck didnt share some resemblance with a bloodsucker. The
unadorned, rodent-like appearance of the man just begs for such a comparison; a comparison
that encourages screenwriter Steven Katz to pen the ambitious and intriguing Shadow of
the Vampire. It is a fictionalized story recounting the making of Nosferatu
with the assumption that its director, F.W. Murnau, cast a genuine vampire for his 1922
classic.
John Malkovich is perfectly cast as the egomaniacal and questionably evil Friedrich
Wilhelm Murnau, a brilliant filmmaker obsessed about realizing his vision of the perfect
vampire film. In the spirit of a true director, Murnau uses any means necessary to create
a realistic atmosphere for his actors. His leading lady Greta (Catherine McCormack)
accuses him of scaring the hell out of her with all the "spooky shit" hes
been saying to motivate her character. His producer, Albin Grau (Udo Kier), wishes he
would shoot within the confines of a studio rather than the more costly and distant
location of Czechoslovakia. Finally, and even more bizarre and unbeknownst to his crew,
the secretive auteur has retained the services of one Max Shreck, a mysterious
"character" actor who just happens to be a genuine vampire.
Made up from head to toe, Willem Dafoe is the vampire Max Shreck. His performance is
subtle and, at times, over the top. And Shrecks pureness of evil and the tragedy of
character are in perfect balance. Unlike the spit-polished persona of an aristocratic
Count Dracula, Katzs vampire isnt living high on the blood of mortals; he is a
lonely ghoul, longing for the warmth of the sun and forced to suck on the lifeblood of
small vermin. In one scene, a drunken Albin witnesses Shrecks feral nature as he
violently pulls a bat from flight and viciously feeds on its blood. The repulsed producer
can only give applause to what he sees as profound method acting, whilst Shreck steals
away with a bottle of liquor to drown his misery. As a viewer, the scene succeeds in
underscoring the enfeebled nature of this vampire who has but one attainable desire: as
payment for taking on the role of Count Orlock, Shreck wishes to feed upon the blood of
the lovely Greta. The self-serving Murnau is more than willing to oblige the lustful
bloodsucker and sees the final coupling of the two as a moment of absolute realism.
Unfortunately his deal with the devil backfires, and Shreck proceeds to make a buffet out
of the arrogant directors crew. This drives Murnau into a drug-induced breakdown
that threatens to derail his film.
Its a pity that such a promising film was scarred by what I saw as a rush to tell
a rather densely packed story. Im not saying that Director Merhige should have spoon
fed the plot to the audience. But at a scant 93 minutes, parts of the film, and especially
its ending, suffered from what I saw as overly compressed editing. While I suppose
its possible Universal may have tried to jam this proverbial "vampire"
film into the running time of a typical horror movie, such a presumption would be pure
speculation. For all I know the multiple "fade to black" segues and annoyingly
episodic scenes werent attempts at covering plot holes but truly integral to the
films visual style.
Image-wise the photography in Shadow of the Vampire was rich and crisp, while
some indoor and night scenes looked murky. Merhige does mention how his cinematographer,
Lou Bogue, endeavored to mimic the lighting of Baroque painter Caravaggio, but the overall
effect had a tendency to hide much of the surrounding action and cause images to appear
out of focus. In many cases, I found myself straining to see these images in my darkened
room, and at one point, I decided to recalibrate my television for fear that it may be at
fault. Sadly, my efforts were to no avail.
Some indistinct dialogue from a hissing Dafoe was the only flaw in a well-produced, yet
fitting, unassuming soundtrack. Also worth mentioning was the music of relative newcomer
Dan Jones, which did a nice job conveying an emotionally unsettled, yet beautiful mood. As
has been the case for many DTS/Dolby Digital selectable discs, the DTS-encoded tracks
proved to be more dynamic and crisp than their counterpart.
Creature feature-wise (sorry, I couldnt help myself), Shadow of the
Vampires extras were pretty anemic. Individual interviews with Producer Nicholas
Cage, Director Merhige, and Willem Dafoe were brief and superficial, and the short
production featurette wasnt even comparable to the excellent examples set by Terry
Gilliams 12 Monkeys or Superman: The Movie. Lackluster production
stills and notes also added to extras that served to make the DVD look feature-packed from
a marketing perspective rather than an enthusiasts perspective. Although Director
Merhiges commentary did contain a high "smooch-fest factor," it did manage
to convey an interesting level of information and subtext about the production. This alone
saved the features portion of the DVD from receiving less than two stars.
While it may seem like I didnt care for Shadow of the Vampire, nothing
could be further from the truth. Despite its flaws, the film does have the distinction of
having an extremely engaging premise along with some topnotch acting. Its just a
shame that its wealth of ideas had more ambition than the resulting film could muster.