| March 1, 2004 They
Should Have Won the Oscar
Again, the Academy Awards have been
given out in a glittering ceremony seen by millions on network television. And again, an
award or two will have been given out that brings the judgment of the voters into
question. We asked our editors and writers to choose particular awards that they felt went
to the wrong people. Several demurred, not wishing to play God. The others jumped in with
abandon and enthusiasm. If each had a time machine, here are the awards he would change.
Write us with yours!
1958 Best Actress
-- Wes Marshall
Won: Susan Hayward for I Want to Live (MGM Home Entertainment)
Should Have Won: Rosalind Russell for Auntie Mame (Warner Home Video)
I Want To Live has its own charms, chief amongst
them John(ny) Mandels un-nominated jazz score. But Susan Haywards overwrought
attempt to look like a swinger and martyr was strictly old school even in 1958. Rosalind
Russell, the poster girl for fast-talking dames, turns in a magnificent performance full
of love, wild abandon, and arch humor. Her philosophy: "Life's a banquet, and most
suckers are starving to death." In a career spanning 53 films, including classics
like His Girl Friday and Gypsy, this was her most fully formed performance.
She was robbed. |
1981 Best Picture and Best Original
Score -- Rad Bennett
Won: Chariots of Fire (Warner Home Video)
Should Have Won: Raiders of the Lost Ark (Paramount)
Though Chariots of Fire is an excellent film, Raiders
of the Lost Ark is a magnificent one. It also featured one the best scores John
Williams has ever written, including a march with a main theme as memorable as any by
Sousa. I think the Vangelis score for Chariots won because the main theme, which is
all the "score" is, was hyped over and over again on radio and TV. Academy
voters were bludgeoned into accepting it as the best of the year, but I think time has
proven that vote misguided. |
1991 Best Picture, Best
Writing, and Best Directing -- Anthony
Di Marco
Won: The Silence of the Lambs (MGM/UA Video)
Should Have Won: Barton Fink (20th Century Fox Home Video)
There is no denying The Silence of the Lambs is a
fantastic film. Between Howard Shores pervasive score and the creepy performance by
Anthony Hopkins I still get chills watching it. Under the skin, however, it is a cop movie
with a predictable ending. Barton Fink is a rarity: an original story directed by
two of the most innovative filmmakers of my generation. Joel and Ethan Coen did not adapt
their screenplay from a book; they created a world of tangible characters that jump
off the screen. The acting is superb. John Goodman and John Turturro turn in performances
that are arguably the best of their careers. Couple this with one of the most memorable
and creepy endings in recent memory, and you have a classic that wasnt even
nominated! |
2003 Best Supporting
Actor -- Josh Barber
Won: Chris Cooper, Adaptation (Columbia TriStar Home Entertainment)
Should Have Won: Paul Newman, Road to Perdition (Universal)
The Oscars seem perpetually to be more about "actor X
should have won a few years ago for film Y, so we'll give him one now" than a real
judge of current merit. See Julia Roberts for one example. Chris Cooper was beautifully
overbearing in American Beauty, but Adaptation was a real clunker through
and through. However, as aging gangster John Rooney, Paul Newman gave a performance worthy
of a leading man without ever overstepping the film's main stars -- he did it as a support
to the others, but got overlooked. Maybe it's just Sam Mendes who pulls great performances
from his actors -- he directed both Road to Perdition and American Beauty. |
|