
|

One Night
at
McCool's
|
|
|
| . |
. |
| Starring: Liv Tyler, Matt Dillon, John Goodman, Michael Douglas,
Andrew Dice Clay, Paul Reiser, Richard Jenkins, Reba McEntire Directed by: Harald Zwart |
Theatrical Release: 2001
DVD Release: 2002Dolby Digital 5.1
Widescreen (anamorphic) |
When a films greatest asset is Andrew
Dice Clay, I expect the film to be targeted toward a specific audience. For example, I
remember finding Ford Fairlane humorous when I was about nineteen, but I was also a
sophomore in college and probably drunk at the time. Nevertheless, I knew what I was
getting myself into given the name centered on the marquee. If, however, a film has an
all-star cast with the likes of Liv Tyler, John Goodman, and Michael Douglas and
Mr. Clay delivers one of his best performances, then I know Im in trouble.
At the core of One Night at McCools sits
Jewel, a woman who has mastered the art of getting men to do what she wants. Her dream is
to have the perfect home and the best DVD player money can buy (sounds like a keeper to
me). Like a chameleon, her persona changes from mother figure to dominatrix to homemaker,
respective to three rather pathetic men. And even though the film does present her in a
less-than-flattering light, she isnt necessarily a bad person. To argue that she is
would be hypocritical, since all humans use some level of manipulation to get what they
want. Where one would use money or social class as a means to maneuver, Jewel uses the
age-old instrument of sex.
The script by Stan Seidel has many interesting ideas, but
they go nowhere fast. The ensemble cast inhabits characters that are neither interesting
nor sympathetic. But the clincher is that I never once believed that these men didnt
have a choice. Making observations about the power women have over a mans libido is
one thing. But building a film on characters as spineless as Randy, Carl, and detective
Dehling, or as completely unlikable as Jewel, gives the audience no one to root for. If
Harald Zwart and first-time screenwriter Stan Seidel were trying to make a point, they
should have developed more compelling characters to deliver it.
One of the few moments where this film did succeed was in
the well-shot daydream sequences, which were captured in stunning detail on this DVD.
Audio was equally crisp with good vocal intelligibility and good use of surrounds when the
visuals called for them. Alas, this is the type of movie where pretty pictures simply
cant make up for the sins of its plot.
That Michael Douglas played producer as well as thespian
probably figures into how the production managed to get the cast it did. Judging by the
short and scatterbrained documentary they did have a good time shooting the film.
Unfortunately my opinion of this film felt flat long before I managed to force myself to
sample its anemic list of special features.
Its possible that I am completely off base in my
criticisms. Maybe I just needed to look deeper into the narrative. Look beyond the bad
acting and cardboard characters to find its true meaning. Maybe Matt Dillons
character wasnt as lame as I first thought. Maybe John Goodman wasnt walking
aimlessly though his role. But then again, maybe Mr. Clay will be the next Pacino. |