
|
Crop
Circles:
Quest for Truth |
|

|
|
|
|
| . |
. |
| Directed by: William Gazecki |
Theatrical Release: 2002
DVD Release: 2003
Studio: Open Edge MediaDolby
Digital 2.0 stereo
Full Screen |
Some
"supernatural" phenomena are hard to take seriously: the idea that a giant
plesiosaur may be living undetected in a shallow Scottish lake, for instance. Some, on the
other hand, are hard to discount. Academy Award-nominated documentarian William Gazecki
has looked at this second type in Crop Circles: Quest for Truth.
For decades now, mysterious shapes have been appearing in
the cornfields of England; circles, boxes, lines, and swirls seem to appear overnight. The
plant stalks are not broken, but are bent over to create the patterns. The edges are
crisp, and most designs involve complex mathematics. Are these crop circles evidence of
alien intelligence, dedicated pranksters, or something else entirely?
When Hollywood tries to turn its eye on unexplained events,
the results are usually less than scientific: Signs and The Mothman Prophecies
are two recent overblown examples. Fortunately, there's now a levelheaded, grounded look
at one set of natural mysteries.
Crop Circles does not take the supermarket-tabloid
approach of trying to pin the crop circles on aliens, UFOs, pranksters, the government, or
some sort of new-age consciousness. In fact, the movie doesn't seem to favor any single
explanation, presenting the various hypotheses to the viewer without trying to force facts
to fit the theory.
The focus is on facts and science rather than little green
men, which is more likely to sway viewers than some flight of X-Files-ish fancy.
Nearly all the interviewees point toward some terrestrial (or at least natural) origin for
the circles, ranging from dropping water levels to ambient microwave energy. Gazecki wants
viewers to think about the unknown themselves, rather than offering an oversimplified E.T.
theory.
The documentary does suffer from a lack of opposing
viewpoints. Interviews with those who claim that the circles are indeed complicated hoaxes
would have given a bit more balance to the film, and ultimately could have strengthened
the case of the believers. There is scarcely any mention of the obvious fakes over the
years or how they differ from the "real" circles.
While much of the film comprises current interviews, a lot
of it contains archival footage or personal handheld home video, so the image quality
varies throughout. The video segments sometimes looked as though they were plagued with
tracking problems, which could either be a flaw in the original tape or a stylistic choice
meant to convey the "amateur" nature of the film. Gazecki shot his own parts
well, giving the new footage a very nice visual kick.
The audio is never astonishing, but it does its job
adequately. As with the video, the source material makes all the difference: A built-in
microphone on a camcorder doesn't produce the same quality of sound as a boom mike
operated by a sound technician. Still, nothing is ever terrible. There arent any
major complaints about the sound.
Perhaps because Crop Circles: Quest for Truth is not
a big blockbuster film, it doesn't receive many flashy extras. The special features
include four additional sequences, a highlight montage, five interview clips with Gazecki,
and the film's trailer. The deleted scenes are interesting, but none would have made a big
difference in the final film. In particular, one interview about a cereologist's encounter
with the CIA a number of years ago is quite intriguing, but would have seemed far too
paranoid in the body of the film.
Crop Circles: Quest for Truth is not going to answer
any questions about the creation of these big works of grainy art, but that is not its
purpose. It is, instead, about the quest for those answers. Director William Gazecki does
a fine job of presenting the facts without making the participants look like crackpots in
tinfoil hats. Though he's not likely to win over anyone who's dedicated to the notion that
crop circles are a scam, the film is entertaining and likely to make you think. |