I was 13 when I first understood how
important good character development was to a story. Martin Sheens portrayal of
President Kennedy in the 1983 mini-series of the same name was so effective, so realistic,
that the concluding scenes in Texas moved me to sadness -- obligating me to grieve for a
man who had died some six years before my birth. Over the course of my movie-watching
years, there have been a handful of films that have sparked the same reaction from the pit
of my stomach.
Though its depiction of what happened in Somalia in 1993 is unflinchingly visceral, and
instills a feeling of profound shellshock, Black Hawk Down fails to offer
characters that the audience could become emotionally attached to. Producer Jerry
Bruckheimer and director Ridley Scott do their best by casting recognizable stars. But
death takes only those who are rendered unrecognizable by identical crew cuts and
camouflaged fatigues. Ultimately, I could not grieve because I didnt know who to
grieve for.
Of course, attractive, recognizable faces are only half of the equation; elements of
personality that dont ring false need to be added to the mix. Looking down the
films roster, only Tom Sizemores Lieutenant Colonel McNight, Josh
Hartnetts Matt Eversman, and Sam Shepards Major General Garrison come close to
breaking out of their two-dimensional roles. And though Ewan McGregor nails his southern
brogue, his coffee-grinding Grimes rides the line of being a superficial caricature.
Some may argue that Black Hawk Down presents an improvement over Ridley
Scotts Gladiator, but I disagree. From a level of popcorn entertainment, Gladiators
pace and characters are more enjoyable and more easily digestible. There is little doubt
that Black Hawk Down offers a huge improvement in terms of writing, characters, and
direction when compared to Bruckheimers atrocious Pearl Harbor. The
difference between Ridley Scott's and Michael Bays stylized camera work is that
Scott knows how to tell a story with the camera. Michael Bay is like a kid with a new toy
whos just looking for the coolest way to use it.
With the exception of obvious MPEG noise in the opening sand-soaked sequence, the
films excellent production values are well preserved in the DVD transfer. The high
contrast offers a washed-out look that has become commonplace amongst desert-location war
films (i.e., David Russells Three Kings). The picture is sharp and
exhibits good black levels. Audio is good, if not a bit lean sounding. Sound effects and
dialogue were, however, clean and very intelligible. One pleasant surprise is an
atypically restrained Hans Zimmer score, which takes second fiddle to a selection of
well-chosen popular songs. Given that Scotts Gladiator sported a DTS track,
the absence of one on Black Hawk Down is a mystery. The Dolby Digital track is
fine, but DTS may have offered that last ounce of slam and bang.
You get a sense of when a DVD is rushed into production. With the exception of an OK
featurette, the extras on this DVD were abysmal. Between the zero extras and the lack of
DTS, Im guessing this is not the last "edition" of this film well
see.
Saving Private Ryan remains the defacto standard of modern war dramas. It not
only features incredible war sequences and an interesting human story, but it also has
engrossing characters that give a face to the tragedy. Black Hawk Down is a good
movie, but it gives no face to the men who died that day in 1993.